Home   Browse Homes   Address Search   Foreclosures   Home Values   Apartments   Forums   Feedback
  My Lookup  |  Register  |  Login  
 

1069 Archer St


San Diego, CA  92109
General Info
Area:   Pacific Beach & Mission Beach Real Estate
Zoning:  Single Family Residential
Use:  Single Family Residential
Parcel Number:  4151811000
Sales History
DatePriceHeldReturnAnnual
11/07/2008$1,080,0002y 11m-37%-14%
11/18/2005$1,715,0002y 9m196%48%
02/07/2003$580,000n/a-   -   
Additional Resources
Nearby Homes For Sale
AddressPrice
4944 #404 Cass St$475,000   
1035 Archer$995,000   
5286 Cass$799,000   
5235 Cass St$899,000   
988 Agate St$569,900
1045 Turquoise Ave #A$639,000   
936 Sapphire St #A$509,000   
Pacific Shores$278,000   
Pacific Shores #301$360,000   
Pacific Shores #314$248,700   
1027 Tourmaline St #C$500,000 to $525,876   
Pacific Shores #112$230,000   
Pacific Shores #306$171,000   
704 Archer St$1,849,997
709 Agate St #1$319,000   

Nearby Properties
AddressSales DatePrice
1029 Archer St1/31/2007$735,000
1035 Archer St7/23/1998$215,000
1045 Archer St4/16/1999$350,000
1051 Archer St4/1/1997$245,000
1059 Archer Stn/an/a
5284 Dawes St8/31/2004$875,000
5262 Dawes St5/18/1998$264,000
1076 Agate Stn/an/a
1068-70 Agate St12/14/2001$650,000
1058-60 Agate Stn/an/a
Tax Assessment
Land Value:  $1,000,000
Improvement Value:  $715,000
Net Value:  $1,715,000
Est Property Tax:  $21,438
Media

View Full Size Map



 Discussion

jpinpb 11/7/2008 12:49:57 PMReply

Whoa!! What happened to all our comments??!!!
 
jpinpb 11/7/2008 12:50:22 PMReply

Beds/Baths: 4 / 4
Square Feet: 2,962 sf
PPSF: $336
Lot Size: 6,500 sf
Listed: 07/27/2008
 
jpinpb 11/7/2008 12:54:38 PMReply

JOKE lifestyle
 
jpinpb 11/7/2008 12:57:12 PMReply

Truth about The Swans
 
jakob 11/7/2008 1:15:53 PMReply

I suspect there was a complaint and the entire comment thread was deleted. I'm not surprised as this site is run by a Realtor.

I've been toying with the idea of creating a new site without any of the limitations inherent in a Realtor-run site. Basically a site where everyone can say whatever they want. And I can fix any of the issues and annoyances that sdlookup has. The one major issue I see is getting the MLS data. It seems you need to be a Realtor to access the IDX feed. I could scrape it from Realtor.com or another site but that is more limited and possibly against the rules. What do you think about the idea of a totally independent site?

 
jpinpb 11/7/2008 1:24:58 PMReply

My guess is Rhonda and Brian couldn't handle the truth. Probably threatened SDL. Luckily OC's blog tells the whole story and doesn't delete anything. In fact, an added comment in October. My guess, one of the Swans before they made them take down the comments here.

A totally independent site is a great idea.
 
jpinpb 11/7/2008 1:26:17 PMReply

I see they're still running Reader ads. Making tens of thousands, yet running ads in the Reader. LOL.
 
jpinpb 11/7/2008 2:10:35 PMReply

Sadly, freedom of speech is only on OC's blog. I knew SDL has removed certain posts if there were links to other realtor sites. I didn't think they'd remove an entire thread.

 
jpinpb 11/7/2008 2:12:19 PMReply

Property taxes are still due. All the money the Swans make, their world tours, etc. but they've defaulted last year and owe $22,542.27. Of course this December they will have to pay another 9,651.12.

Public record.
 
jpinpb 11/7/2008 9:16:26 PMReply

After all these months of pending.

Status: Sold
Sold Price: $1,080,000

That's a 37% hit on the immune coast. Seen a lot of immunity going on over there - not! 635k gone in 3 years.


Wonder where they're headed next. Will they change the photos on their website, since they're no longer living in their palacial McMansion?

On the bright side, they lived there for free and didn't pay their loan amount and saved some money there and not paying taxes help save another 22k. Inspiring.
 
jpinpb 11/7/2008 9:54:36 PMReply

Piggs saved the evidence, too.
 
jpinpb 11/7/2008 10:06:35 PMReply

Where do you go after this? Maybe they'll buy up to 9826 LJ Farms
 
waterboy 11/8/2008 8:30:59 AMReply

Was this a short sale? Because if they had little or no money down on that property and convinced the Bank to take the short sale at this amount then they are great persuaders. Maybe they can convince the bank involved with the short sale of 1040 Van Nuys to take $600k.
 
jpinpb 11/8/2008 8:34:51 AMReply

This was a short sale. Don't know if you read any of the posts on OC's blog or the Piggs. There was a first and second. 100% financed, plus probably cash given by the developer to the Swans after they purchased it. I think the first was 1.3 million.

Seriously. I'm just so glad we gave 700 billion to the poor banks. I mean, judging from the flourishing business of the Swans, it was a sound loan and who could've predicted a default. /end sarcasm (in case it wasn't totally obvious)
 
waterboy 11/9/2008 11:28:41 AMReply

Still can't believe that the owners/realtors convinced the bank on this short sale. Have any other short sales been discounted that much? I'm sure they had back mortgage payments due on top of the P&I of the loan. I guess we will see if they can pull it off again with their other properties
 
jpinpb 11/9/2008 1:13:43 PMReply

It is remarkable. Makes me sick to find out this information. I don't know how much they got back from the builder Armstrong, but on the Piggs blog it was suggested that oftentimes the builder would give money back. So I wonder if they made any payment at all the whole time they lived there. Not one mortgage payment or property taxes. And then to speak about their ethical business. Gotta get some dramamine. Feeling nauseous.
View this topic in the full forums to upload pictures and report abuse.
 Quick Post

Please sign in or register to post to the forums.
Please read Forum Rules before posting.
  
 
   Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | SDLookup.com © 2009 Lookup Realty Team led by Joseph Lerner at Keller Williams Metro  |  800-630-7881
3965 Fifth Avenue Suite 300  |  San Diego, CA  92103  |  DRE# 01757467